|
|
| William Nelson Pendleton. Pendleton was an Episcopal minister in Lexington, Virginia, where Lee lived after the war as president of Washington College (later, Washington and Lee). Through his ministry, Pendleton became a close friend of the Lee family. In his position as chairman of the Lee Monument Association, he devoted himself to enshrining the "sacred memory" of Robert E. Lee. He eulogized Lee on fund-raising trips throughout the South and it was Pendleton who set up many of the images that lead to Lee being looked upon as a Christ-like figure. |
| John William Jones. Jones had been a chaplain in the 13th Virginia Infantry and was a Baptist minister at Lexington where he, too, was a close friend of the Lees in the post-war years. Jones's 1874 book, Personal Reminiscences, Anecdotes and Letters of Robert E. Lee, became a source for many later writers on the war and Lee, in spite of its many flaws |
| Fitzhugh Lee. A nephew of Robert E. Lee, his accounts of the war and of the Lee-Longstreet relationship carried far more weight than they were due. |
These four, then, were chief architects of the Virginia movement that shaped the Southern Historical Society Papers. From their work would emerge a skewed view of the Civil War. Lee became a near deity and a military genius, while at the images of Jackson and Lee's other lieutenants were reduced. The war in the east -- that is, the battles in Virginia -- and the role of Lee's Army of Northern Virginia became pivotal, even to the point of ignoring the war for control of the Mississippi, the war for the border states, the Federal blockade, and the Federal drive to cut the South into pieces. From this glorification of Lee and his Army, came the emergence of Gettysburg as the pivotal battle of the war. In fact, following Gettysburg, Lee never ventured north of the Virginia borders and was gradually contained in Richmond and finally pursued to Appomattox.
If Lee was a deity and a genius and the Army of Northern Virginia invincible, and if the war in the East was the real war, then the reason for the South's defeat must lie, not in Lee's defeat, but in whatever it was that caused Lee to lose at Gettysburg. That bogey-man became Longstreet. The editors and authors of the Papers -- the four named above -- launched the most amazing campaign of falsehood, misrepresentation, and myth-making to destroy Longstreet and pin on him the blame for the loss of the war. Longstreet did not help his cause by his own public blundering, unrestrained attacks, and continued support of the hated Republicans.
I grew up in Mississippi in the late 1940s and 1950s; the Civil War was very much alive then. I grew up hearing tales of the bravery of Lee, Jackson, Beauregard, and other Southern icons. I never heard of Longstreet until I was an Army officer reading about the Civil War. The works I cite here provide a view of this one aspect of Civil War historiography. I find this tale fascinating and hope that you will, too.
![]()
Recommended Books These books are available from Amazon.com. If you would like to see more, or want to order a book, click on the title to link directly to the order pages at Amazon.com
| Lee's Tarnished Lieutenant: James Longstreet and His Place in Southern History. By William Garrett Piston. |
| The Marble Man: Robert E. Lee and His Image in American Society. By Thomas L. Connelly. |
| General James Longstreet: The Confederacy's Most Controversial Soldier. By Jeffry D. Wert. |
Click on the logo to go to Amazon.com.
|
|